Syndetic Fluxion

is a blog

Archive for the ‘Jersey City’ Category

PADRP

Posted by Louis James on December 24, 2007

The Powerhouse Arts District of Jersey City

Jersey City. Arts capital of New Jersey? It’s been called that. These days though some JC artists feel they are getting short-changed by the city. They feel the city has not followed through on commitments — via various zoning laws and provisions for developers — to provide affordable live/work artist studios. I’ve read the entire Powerhouse Arts District Redevelopment Plan (PADRP), and I must say that it is troublesome. Looking at the document from a macro view, it is very easy to accuse it and its framers of elitism. It seeks to create a special class of Jersey City citizens — qualified artists — that should be protected from free-market real estate forces on the sole proposition that these artists somehow are inherently more capable of contributing to the overall good of a community than any other type of citizen in the community. It also seeks to provide the type of haven to artists that other groups of obviously more needy people never get. The elderly, the physically and mentally handicapped, the blind, the deaf, should all be so lucky to have a municipality equally concerned for their special housing needs. When finished reading the PADRD, you cannot help but feel that the people that wrote it see themselves as victims looking to create a below market price real estate sanctuary onto themselves.

The PADRP rests on some very questionable legal grounds. Mainly, is it fair and just to make affordable housing available only to a very small and select group of low to middle income people, and not to all people of low and middle income? Poor people have always resided in JC, long before any artists had. The qualifications to be considered an artist by the PADRP and thus eligible for the special housing offerings are not that strict. In fact, it reads as though you only need to practice your art as a committed hobbyist rather than as a working professional. You can sell used cars by day and as long as you sketch out a drawing or two each and every month and show them to your friends, you’re an artist! By PADRD metrics, I myself qualify as an artist of three disciplines: writing, film/video, and photography. Yet in a recent Jersey Journal front page article, it is noted that many of the new live/work artist units available are not being snapped up by the glut of eligible artist applicants. Instead it seems many of the artists have not been following through with the required paperwork. The city and the building owners are now starting to allow anyone with the proper income requirements to apply for and occupy these units. Which is a good thing because empty affordable housing is perhaps even more offensive than no affordable housing at all.

The PADRD’s complex zoning restrictions certainly do not make the area a very appealing one to developers as it will cost a lot of money to meet all the requirements. But that might have been the point of the PADRP, to preserve the status quo of a blighted, toxic industrial area so a small group of people could continue to live and work on the cheap. But now that JC has become a very desirable place to live — which is not entirely due to the artists and arts community, as the PADRP and local JC artists would have you believe — even toxic, industrial land lots are now seen as diamonds in the rough. (And before we do anything else, let’s all please stop and pause to reflect at just how great that is!) Let’s face it, it’s the PATH train with its easy access to New York City that makes JC and its real estate so desirable, not its art or culture. The same market forces that shape New York City are going to shape JC too, it’s unavoidable. Regrettable to some perhaps, but we should remember that New York City is considered the greatest city in the world. We all have to figure out how to adapt to this changing environment and not expect the environment to adapt to our particular needs: in case you haven’t noticed that’s how it works, that’s how it has worked, and that’s how it will always work. One fact of economics, real estate development, and politics is that most municipalities seek to develop land so as to increase their tax revenues. A city like JC needs all the tax dollars it can get to improve its educational system, its social services, its public works, and to fund various government departments like its fire and police departments. When a company like the Toll Brothers seeks to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to create properties that will provide the kind of property tax dollars that might actually help improve all wards of JC, it is very hard for the city to take the marginal concerns of a very small group of artist all that seriously.

The Toll Brothers actual do seek to meet many of the art and culture requirements of the PADRP. Sure not all of them, but again, a reading of the intricacies of the PADRP makes it clear that it is impossible for any developer or group of developers to hit every one of those nails on the head. The Toll Brothers proposed changes are really not that drastic; many are practical considerations regarding building materials. In one case they would like the option to use aluminum instead of wrought iron. In another, they want to reduce the width of some of the parking lots from nine feet to eight-and-a-half feet. Yes they want to make some of the buildings taller so they can recoup their sizeable investment by having more units to sell at market prices. The nature and scope of the redevelopment outlined in the PADRP is going to cost huge sums of money. So far, it seems that the Toll Brothers are the only developers that wish to make the investment in the Powerhouse District and are willing to work within the vast majority of the PADRP regulations. It can only be expected that any organization like the Toll Bothers is going to have some changes in mind. Let’s not forget that the entire PADRP could easily be voted out of existence by the JC legislature, and the Powerhouse District could become one of many things that would be far, far worse than what the Toll Brothers are proposing.

To have a thriving art and cultural scene in any city, you need to have a lot of residents in that city. The more people that live here in JC, the larger the demand becomes for art and culture. Residents of JC often complain that there are too few good bars, restaurants, and shops to be found locally. More are needed they say. Yet most of the local bars, restaurants, and shops are hardly booming. Their owners are anxiously awaiting the population growth spurt destined for JC as new housing is built and occupied. These business owners understand that more residents here equals more economic stability for them. Why don’t the artists here in JC comprehend this basic principle? Surely not all artists wish to remain starving do they? If they do, well then they are going to have to do so somewhere else, as most of us like to eat.

Overall the PADRP could be a great thing. Its only major tweak should be that the affordable housing be made available to all people and not strictly reserved for qualified artists. I foresee minor concessions being made by current Powerhouse District residents, the Toll Brothers, and city officials as they are all fundamentally on the same page.

Posted in Economics, Jersey City, Opinion | 4 Comments »

JSQ to G-street

Posted by Louis James on August 10, 2007

Jersey City: Journal Square versus Downtown

The Slow Journey from Ward C to E

I’ve been living in Jersey City since 2001, mostly in the Journal Square area. The Marion section, to be precise. I moved there August 1, 2001. Yep one month before 9/11, what a tragedy. If I had moved two months later, my rent would have been half as much! Journal Square is the only place where my rent actually went down one year. It was only 25 bucks, but damn, when has that happened? It was like “yeah, it sucks here, but you’re white, so would you please consider staying?” But after five good years I said fuck it, and recently moved to the Downtown area of Jersey City to be with my people: hipster dilettante posers! I never figured out why the Downtown area is called Downtown, I mean it’s in the northeast corner of the city. Greenville is downtown. The Heights is called The Heights ‘cause it’s north and up on a hill. So what’s up with Downtown?

Anyway, I have a few initial observations and comparisons between the two areas, Journal Square and Downtown. First off, it took a little getting used to all the friendly people walking around Downtown. There’s way too much gentrification going on here, not enough crotchety old men to curse at you in Italian. The nice people of Downtown will often look you in the eye and nod and say “hey” as they pass you on the sidewalk. In JSQ, we avoid making eye contact altogether. And if you do, you never say “hey”, you say “why you gotta be like that?” or “fuck you man!” or “what’s up baby!” And people say “what kind of dog is that?” Downtown, not “does your dog bite?” Weird.

I prefer the JSQ PATH station to the Grove Street station. It’s bigger, brighter, and has more QuickCard machines. But it’s exposed to the elements, so I guess Grove will be better come winter. Plus there’s no hill to climb.

Aesthetically speaking, DT has JSQ beat hands down. The architecture of JSQ sucks. You can’t beat all the brownstones of DT. And there are a lot more trees DT. I don’t even mind all the high-rise condos that are popping up DT, for looks anyway.

Location wise, DT has JSQ beat too. That PATH leg from Grove to JSQ is longer that you think! Plus DT you are closer to the waterfront and Liberty State Park. Hamilton and Van Vorst parks are great too. I dig the dog run in VV Park, even if it is kinda small. I swear everyone in the dog run is gay: the men, the women, the dogs, even the married couples and pregnant ladies. It’s true: male dogs are humping other male dogs all the time, female dogs engage in 69 with each other. Not that there’s anything wrong with that! There are more, but not many more, bars and restaurants DT. But they are all nicer than what’s around JSQ. JSQ has better drugstores and more open-all-night business though. Both neighborhoods score equal on Turnpike access.

Culturally DT takes the cake again. There is no culture in JSQ. Except for the Loew’s, which is quite a prize. (The Stanley looks nice outside, but don’t go in there!) And well there’s Little India too, so I guess there is some culture. Also there’s an Islamic center or two around JSQ, which comes in handy when planning your skyscraper bombings. The beer is cheaper but the selection worse in JSQ. And the wine selection is horrid. Socially DT has a lot going on. (See the Rock-it Docket.) Before living in Jersey City, I lived in just about every neighborhood in Manhattan over the course of nearly nine years. I also lived in Astoria and on Long Island for a while. Nowhere have I seen a better, more cohesive and lively social scene than in Downtown Jersey City. And I’m not talking about the bar scene at all, as one might imply when discussing the social scene of a city (think Hoboken). A neighborhood has to have something good going on if the band Interpol decides to live there. Jealous Williamsburg/Greenpoint? JC’s got all the hipness of Williamsburg and even more chromium than Greenpoint. That’s our slogan.

Oddly, I felt safer in JSQ. Maybe because I was out of my demographic and totally anonymous there. The token white boy: invisible. I’d leave the front door open on hot summer nights and sometimes forget to shut it when I went to bed. Never did I feel like I’d taken my life in my hands when I did that. You never heard about muggings on the block in JSQ. Sure there would be a shooting or two every now and then, but at least you’d see it coming and/or had it coming. Muggers are sneaky fucks. Nothing worse than getting mugged by a twelve-year-old with a butter knife. Also, I had a driveway in JSQ and never had to worry about my car. Well, actually I had to worry about it getting hit by a cricket ball or bat from the kids that would play street-cricket. I think the kids used my car as a base, or a wicket, or some such thing. I lived on a dead-end street, which in an urban area doubles as a sports stadium for kids. Three of my friends had cars stolen Downtown, and I must admit I feel just a touch concerned about it too. But I don’t drive a Honda, so maybe I’m okay. The alternate side of the street parking doesn’t suck as bad as I thought, you just can’t oversleep. That little Parking Authority scooter cracks me up. It’s like a golf cart and a Vespa had a baby. I’m tempted to tip it over and see if the guy inside can get out, or if he’ll be forced to do a David Blaine man-in-a-lucite-box type of escape. Hopefully.

All in all, I’m glad I made the move. I’m still in the honeymoon phase; it feels like I’m on vacation. Sort of.

Oh yeah, Downtown cost more. A lot more. But still less than Manhattan!

Posted in Jersey City | 3 Comments »